The Coalition for Government Procurement

AUGUST 15, 2024

4 The Court rejected the government’s contention that because OTs are not procurement contracts subject to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”), they are necessarily removed from the Court’s bid protest jurisdiction. The new prices will be effective Jan 1, 2026. 1491(b)(1) (emphasis added). E.E.O.C. , 480, 486 (2015)).

E-procurement 52

E-procurement Supply Chain Price Procurement 52

The Coalition for Government Procurement

AUGUST 22, 2024

4 The Court rejected the government’s contention that because OTs are not procurement contracts subject to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”), they are necessarily removed from the Court’s bid protest jurisdiction. Examining the text and legislative history of the OT statutes at issue (i.e., 1491(b)(1) (emphasis added).

E-procurement 52

E-procurement Bidding Procurement Consulting 52

The Coalition for Government Procurement

AUGUST 1, 2024

4 The Court rejected the government’s contention that because OTs are not procurement contracts subject to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”), they are necessarily removed from the Court’s bid protest jurisdiction. Examining the text and legislative history of the OT statutes at issue (i.e., 1491(b)(1) (emphasis added).

Supply Chain 52

Supply Chain Bidding E-procurement Risk Management 52

The Coalition for Government Procurement

AUGUST 8, 2024

4 The Court rejected the government’s contention that because OTs are not procurement contracts subject to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”), they are necessarily removed from the Court’s bid protest jurisdiction. The rule consolidates the four existing MAS EPA clauses into a single clause. 1491(b)(1) (emphasis added).

Supply Chain 52

Supply Chain E-procurement Procurement Bidding 52

Procurement Notes

SEPTEMBER 15, 2021

15] Despite the broad description, in the context of a procurement contract or a real property lease, the GovCon Order only applies to the following types of contracts. “(i) Price , the Supreme Court stated that “[p]rivate persons, jointly engaged with state officials in the prohibited action, are acting ‘under color’ of law.

E-procurement 40

E-procurement Government Government Contract 40