This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Serious Irregularity The leading authority on Section 68 challenges is RAV Bahamas Ltd and another v Therapy Beach Club Inc [2021] UKPC 8 , which prescribes that intervention should be limited to ‘extreme’ cases and that the test of serious irregularity imposes a ‘high threshold’.
In Eiser , Dr Alexandrov’s partnership in the chamber from 2002 to 2017 was considered. Explicit recognition of this lower threshold in investment arbitration may prima facie appear to have resolved the complication arising out of the interpretation of the term “manifest” in Article 57 of the ICSID Convention.
The first arbitral awards over the matter arising out of the Argentine financial crisis 2001/2002 are prominent for their contradictory outcome (see in particular CMS v Argentina , Sempra v Argentina , Enron v Argentina on the one hand, and LG&E v Argentina on the other hand). A novelty is the approach to the notion of security interests.
The threshold to challenge an interim award on the basis of its finality is lower in comparison to establishing whether such an interim award is binding or not. Another example concerning the deposit of security amount being enforceable as an interim award is Banco de Seguros del Estado v. Mutual Marine Offices, Inc. , 2d 362 (S.D.N.Y.
decisions made by referees or umpires or juries), unless there are fraud or corruption allegations, but this is a high threshold to reach. The discussion then moved on to the possible jurisdiction of the CAS over E-sport disputes and all panelists agreed on the possibility of this development happening in a near future.
Examples of contract-specific limitations on cost include negotiated dollar value thresholds for compensable changes and caps on rates proposed to make a contractor’s proposal more competitive. 2002); see also Stanford Univ. Limitations in FAR Subpart 31.2 19] KBR Servs., 57530, 19-1 BCA ¶ 37,205. [20] 20] Teledyne Indus., Geotech Div.
To be at the 100-employee threshold, the employer must be a “business enterprise that employs— (i) 100 or more employees, excluding part-time employees; or (ii) 100 or more employees, including part-time employees, who in the aggregate work at least 4,000 hours per week, exclusive of hours of overtime.” [57] 122] See P.R. Burke Corp.
In 2002, the Constitutional Court of Colombia (“Court”), in Judgment C-339 , ruled on the constitutionality of these provisions, stating that páramos are part of the mining exclusion zones and are constitutionally protected. Mr. Martínez de Hoz, an arbitrator in this case, dissented.
In 2002, the Constitutional Court of Colombia (“Court”), in Judgment C-339 , ruled on the constitutionality of these provisions, stating that páramos are part of the mining exclusion zones and are constitutionally protected. Mr. Martínez de Hoz, an arbitrator in this case, dissented.
18] And, for DoD, Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (“DFARS”) 216.203-4 limits the use of the FAR EPA clauses to DoD contracts that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (presently $250,000 with exceptions), and performance is longer than six months. [19] 91, 94 (2002) (price increase is not an out-of-scope mod.
There is no exception for contracts below the simplified acquisition threshold, for commercial products and services, or for commercially available off-the-shelf (COTS) products. The new FAR provisions are to be included in all solicitations and contracts.
There is no exception for contracts below the simplified acquisition threshold, for commercial products and services, or for commercially available off-the-shelf (COTS) products. The new FAR provisions are to be included in all solicitations and contracts.
The SGCA clarified that the threshold for identifying vexatious or oppressive conduct is a high one. Significantly, the SGCA declined to adopt the sufficient interest test, as suggested by Lord Scott in obiter in the House of Lords decision of Donohue v Armco Inc and others [2002] 1 All ER 749.
The proposed rule creates a framework for ensuring that contractors provide the protections for CUI required in 32 CFR part 2002 which requires that contractors handling CUI meet the cybersecurity and privacy requirements of NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2 among other cyber requirements. The public has until January 28, 2025, to submit comments.
FAR § 1.501–2(b) (2002) (emphasis added); Pls.’ FAR § 1.501–1 (2002); Pls.’ 17] Further, since the GovCon Order was issued pursuant to FPASA, if a contract does not fall within the ambit of FPASA (e.g., a personal services contract), it should not be subject to the GovCon Order. [18] ’ App. at 76 (emphasis added).
In the event that such threshold is exceeded, but the customs value does not exceed USD 117, the flat rate of 17% will be applied. In the case of goods coming from the United States or Canada, they may be imported free of IGI and VAT when their customs value does not exceed USD 50 or its equivalent in local currency.
75] Looking at the FRED data , it shows a little more variability, but nonetheless affirms ~20% of GDP as a threshold that appears difficult to surpass. [76] 53] Adam Hayes, Taylor Rule, Investopedia.com (June 24, 2002), available at [link]. [54] of GDP (call it 20% for the sake of simplicity). [75] 76] Why ~20%, and why for so long?
There is no exception for contracts below the simplified acquisition threshold, for commercial products and services, or for commercially available off-the-shelf (COTS) products. The new FAR provisions are to be included in all solicitations and contracts.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content