This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
However, the Bombay High Court rejected the challenge on the grounds that the circumstances of bias alleged by Avitel did not pass the reasonable third person test, contemplated under General Standard 2(b) of the IBA Guidelines on Conflict of Interest in International Arbitration, 2004 (“ IBA Guidelines 2004 ”).
However, a ‘twin’ provision can be found in Article 41 of Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts (OJ 2004 L 134, p.
Public procurement is like the heartbeat of public spending in most of Africa – by some estimates, it accounts for 17% of the GDP of African Countries. These included ongoing issues such as poor institutional coordination, lack of transparency, high levels of corruption, and murky lines of accountability.
for state government, local government, and educational (SLED) accounts. He began his auditing career at DBPR in 2004 and also worked in state government at the Attorney General’s Office, State Programs Branch. Today, he serves as a Solutions Engineer for Okta in the southeastern U.S.
The Joint Notice is a response to questions arising out of a recent change to SBA regulations and a subsequent Government Accountability Office (GAO) decision. Among other things, this Joint Notice clarifies that companies should not rely on the SBA’s regulations for the proposition that a small business JV will never need to hold an EED.
In recent years, many States have signed investment treaties containing this type of clause based on the US Model BIT (2004), which itself reflects NAFTA case law following the FTC 2001 Note of Interpretation , which clarified that tribunals must apply the MST and no other standard. 444-45, 448-49, 455ff., 420-23).
And so is their interplay (for a more detailed account of the relevant questions, see Kehl & Wuschka, ZEuS 2024 , 59 (67 et seq.)). This post addresses the legal parameters for the UK’s withdrawal and its interaction with the modernization efforts.
This was a crucial issue and the outcome of this case could have provided much needed clarity on the extent to which the Commission does, and indeed must, take procurement law into account in the assessment of State aid measures that involve the award of public contracts. In this post, I will focus on issues 1 and 2.
International Trade Commission (“ITC”), Section 321 imports account for a substantial share of all U.S. 2004 and H.R. Rather, de minimis shipments are typically entered using only manifest data, and there is no importer of record as with typical informal and formal entries. e-commerce imports in fiscal year 2022.
As most of you know, there are three primary fora for bid protests: procuring agencies, the Government Accountability Office (GAO), and the Court of Federal Claims (COFC). 22, 2004, 2005 CPD ¶ 71. The end of the Fiscal Year is upon us, which typically coincides with a flurry of procurement activity and then a wave of bid protests.
for state government, local government, and educational (SLED) accounts. He began his auditing career at DBPR in 2004 and also worked in state government at the Attorney General’s Office, State Programs Branch. Today, he serves as a Solutions Engineer for Okta in the southeastern U.S.
It is the difference between that which a facility could achieve under 100 percent operating time on a one-shift basis, less operating interruptions resulting from time lost for repairs, setups, unsatisfactory materials, and other normal delays, and the extent to which the facility was actually used to meet demands during the accounting period.” [134]
Higher level employees had a pattern of resigning after allegations surfaced, successfully evading reprimand or accountability. The memos revealed that between 2004 and 2020, 665 employees left the Bureau in such maneuvers.
That way, price adjustments can expediently be made, and contract performance can progress, without the contracting office and the contractor driving themselves mad over constant accounting drills. 14, 2004) (“Performance of a pre-existing duty is not sufficient consideration for a supplemental agreement.”). [56] 54] DLAD 16.203-2. [55]
22, 2004); Zafer Constr. 50] See id. at 27,355. [51] 51] See id. [52] 52] See, e.g., Automated Med. 59] See id. at 695 (internal citations omitted). [60] 60] NIKA Tech., United States, 987 F.3d 3d 1025, 1028-29 (Fed. 61] See, e.g., New SI, LLC, B-295209 et al., 2005 CPD ¶ 71, at 2 (Nov. B-295903 et al., B-406067 , 2012 CPD ¶ 57, at 4 (Jan.
Colossal’s accountant asserted that it is common practice for value-added resellers to calculate net revenue by disregarding the cost of goods sold. SBA will not use tax returns or amendments filed with the IRS after the initiation of a size determination. (2)
16, 2020), which addresses JVs under the SBA’s programs, and a subsequent Government Accountability Office (GAO) decision (Aug. 27, 2021) that interpreted the SBA rule without addressing NISP requirements and 32 CFR 2004 or how the two interconnect, thus adding to the confusion.”
For most contractors/subcontractors, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) will not apply unless the employer is a health plan, healthcare clearinghouse, healthcare provider, or a business associate thereto. [75] That means only certain individuals get to see it. 58] 29 U.S.C. § at § 158(a)(1). [60]
No contractor wants to experience massive labor disruption on account of sick days attributed to COVID-19. Consequently, ideally, a Government official will just ask for an anonymized accounting of who is/is not vaccinated. 19, 2004) (quoting Liles Constr. See, e.g. , Adv. Eng’g and Planning Corp., United States , 455 F.2d
He came to work at BEP in 2003 as an IT Security Specialist and was promoted to Manager of the IT Security Division in 2004. Government Accountability Office (GAO). Previously Mark severed as Assistant Director in the Information Technology and Cybersecurity (ITC) team at the Government Accountability Office (GAO).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content