This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Can public authorities procure fair trade products, or are they debarred from specifically referring to the fair trade qualities of those products under the public procurement directive (directive 2004/18/EC)? This is one of the issues underlying the judgment of the Court in Case C-368/10 Commission v. Netherlands.
Early reformers in this first revolution were Ethiopia (2005), Ghana (2005), Kenya (2007), Tanzania (2004), Uganda (2003), and Zambia (2006). In addition, price overruns continued to plague procurement outcomes, as well as poor contract execution, manifested through poor quality works and delays.
Petronz did not pay the purchase price and Mr Ganz referred the dispute to arbitration. Background The dispute arose from a share purchase agreement pursuant to which Mr Ganz and Mr Goren allegedly agreed to sell their shares in a company to Petronz (“the SPA”). The SPA provided for disputes to be resolved by arbitration under the LCIA rules.
Particularly, the Personal Consumption Expenditures Price Index (“PCE”) core inflation rate for January 2024 was 2.8%. [30] 33] Importantly, since the inflation high water marks of 2022, mostly what has occurred is disinflation (decrease of the inflation rate), not actual deflation (price decreases). down from 5.5%
In doing so, many have cited language originating in the 2004 Occidental v. For example, many tribunals have read the common treaty promise of Fair and Equitable Treatment (“FET”) to guarantee the same level of protection as a contractual stabilization clause. That statement may have flown in the past—but for how much longer?
Department of Labor (“DoL”), Bureau of Labor Statistics (“BLS”), September 13 Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) Summary states that “[o]ver the last 12 months, the all items index increased 8.3 1] Similarly, the BLS September 14 Producer Price Index (“PPI”) Summary states that “[o]n an unadjusted basis, the index for final demand moved up 8.7
The Government cannot TFC a contract in bad faith, or as an abuse of discretionsuch as to get a better price, or where the Government formed the contract with no real intention of seeing it through. [59] 2004) (The fact that this contract covers government financial grants does not warrant a different standard. 2d 151, 164 (D.
14, 1996) (“We find that the record here supports the agency’s determination to use negotiated procedures rather than sealed bidding on the ground that the award will not be based on price alone.”); FAR 6.401. [23] 22, 2004); Zafer Constr. 2305(b), and FAR 6.401(b). [22] 22] See Comfort Inn South, B-270819 et al., 59] See id.
Colossal’s financial statements recognized only the commission or the difference between sales price and the product purchase price as its revenue (receipts). Colossal was a value-added reseller of Information Technology (“IT”) equipment.
Price , the Supreme Court stated that “[p]rivate persons, jointly engaged with state officials in the prohibited action, are acting ‘under color’ of law. Price, 383 U.S. 50] It is the term “other person acting under color of law” that is the most interesting. [51] 51] In United States v. 49] See id. at 491-92. [50] 50] 42 U.S.C.
FAR Clause 52.243-4 ), including submitting a price adjustment claim and, if necessary, filing a claim appeal. Practically speaking, the contractor’s best opportunity for doing so is in its price proposal submitted in response to a covered solicitation. 19, 2004) (quoting Liles Constr. See, e.g. , Adv. Eng’g and Planning Corp.,
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content