This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
However, a ‘twin’ provision can be found in Article 41 of Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts (OJ 2004 L 134, p.
Can public authorities procure fair trade products, or are they debarred from specifically referring to the fair trade qualities of those products under the public procurement directive (directive 2004/18/EC)? This is one of the issues underlying the judgment of the Court in Case C-368/10 Commission v. Netherlands.
Whether or not the tiltable turntable equipment qualified for the exemption was important because otherwise the procurement procedure had to comply with the public procurement directive ( directive 2004/18/EC ). This is a matter for the national court to determine.
Background The dispute arose from a share purchase agreement pursuant to which Mr Ganz and Mr Goren allegedly agreed to sell their shares in a company to Petronz (“the SPA”). Petronz did not pay the purchase price and Mr Ganz referred the dispute to arbitration.
The Slovak Government decided not to purchase the stadium and it instead challenged the compatibility with EU law of the State aid package due to a fundamental breach of procurement law. Framing: Directive 2004/18/EC, Directive 2014/24/EU, or it does not matter? Once the stadium was built, NFŠ exercised the put option.
2004 and H.R. Such documentation or information may relate to an offer for sale or purchase or subsequent sale, transportation, importation, or warehousing of the article. 4148 ) This bill was introduced on June 15, 2023, by Sens. Sherrod Brown (D-OH) and Marco Rubio (R-FL) in the Senate, and by Reps.
An example of procurements in which a debriefing is not required are purchases under the GSA Federal Supply Schedule. 22, 2004, 2005 CPD ¶ 71. A debriefing is typically required when a procurement award is based on “competitive proposals.” a)(2); FAR 15.506; FAR 16.505(b)(6). See New SI, LLC, B-295209, et al.,
19,971 in 2004 that the Supreme Court of Chile has denied an exequatur. The Dubai Court of Cassation held that the arbitration clause contained in the main contract was deemed to extend to all subsequent purchase orders entered into between the same parties (which did not contain an arbitration clause).
2004) (That the purpose of a cooperative agreement is assistance and not procurement is not dispositive of the determination of whether a cooperative agreement is a contract.). instead of acquiring (by purchase, lease, or barter) property or services for the direct benefit or use of the United States Government[.] 2d 151, 164 (D.
And, if bond investors will only purchase Government debt at elevated interest rates, that will influence the interest rates across the wider economy—working against any moves that the Fed. 23, 2004) (costs for idle labor caused by a Government stop work order were recoverable under a time-and-materials contract); K&K Indus.,
competition for a blanket purchase agreement or order under the Federal Supply Schedule [31] A competition that uses FAR Part 13 simplified acquisition procedures [32] It is also worth noting that if a procuring agency is not subject to the required debriefing provisions of the U.S. 22, 2004); Zafer Constr. 30] A FAR Subpart 8.4
All other items, such as subcontractor costs, reimbursements for purchases a contractor makes at a customer’s request, investment income, and employee-based costs such as payroll taxes, may not be excluded from receipts. (1) Colossal was a value-added reseller of Information Technology (“IT”) equipment.
On a related note, in the case of schedule contracts awarded under GSA’s Federal Supply Schedule (“FSS”) program, and purchase orders awarded under such contracts are subject to GSA’s Class Deviation CD-2021-13, which covers service orders and supply orders. 19, 2004) (quoting Liles Constr. See, e.g. , Adv. Eng’g and Planning Corp.,
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content