This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In a survey conducted by the Global Arbitration Review (GAR) in 2022 on hearing centre preferences, AIAC was ranked at the forefront among other international institutions, having the highest number of hearing rooms and largest room capacity.
In early 2005, Swiss company Glencore International acquired the assets and assigned them to Glencore Finance (Bermuda). The Tribunal concluded that a treaty dispute was not foreseeable in 2005. A decision on interpretation and correction of the award followed on 6 November 2023. All three assets had been privatized around 2000.
Consequently, the HCCH’s ambition had to be curtailed, so the HCCH temporarily settled for adopting the Convention of 30 June 2005 on Choice of Court Agreements (“Choice of Court Convention”). However, the endeavour proved rather unsuccessful initially due to a lack of consensus on an array of divisive issues.
The dispute concerns a 2005 contract for satellite spectrum capacity and satellite-broadcast wireless access services. Though the award creditor sought the Supreme Court of Canada’s input on the issue, the latter dismissed the application for leave to appeal the decision in mid-May of this year. III of the NYC. II and V(1)(a).
Attempts by parties to torpedo their ongoing cases (particularly when they are not progressing favourably) by simply triggering insolvency protection in their home jurisdiction can backfire and generate scepticism from arbitrators and courts acting in an arbitration-capacity. a), exceeding the scope of the arbitration agreement (Article V.1.c),
Since 2005, Sir David has been consistently praised as one of the worlds outstanding commercial arbitrators, and in recognition of his outstanding contribution to the development of arbitration law and practice in New Zealand and internationally, was awarded a Knighthood by Queen Elizabeth II in 2017. Past interviews are available here.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content