This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Subsequently, the Consorzio v Algeria (2005) tribunal (Gaillard being a member) adopted Gaillard’s view on umbrella clause. The threshold of “appearance of dependence or bias” as laid down in Blue Bank is similar to the “justifiable doubts” standard under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules. This argument was rejected in both cases.
He drew a thread from the first arbitration law in Denmark under Christian V in 1683 to a bill on arbitration in 1972 to the enactment of the 2005 Danish Arbitration Act based on the 1985 UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. 2016.1558/2H), which sets a high threshold for any setting aside arguments.
18 IISD Model 2005 ). 11-18 IISD Model 2005 ). a IISD Model 2005 ). To prevent even minor transgressions from falling under the clause, a threshold-requirement of serious violations could be introduced. Investor obligations can be broadly categorised as legality clauses (e.g.
VR Van Raalte Reclame , 2005). This regulation grants a safe harbor for vertical agreements under certain conditions (among others, a 30% market share threshold and the absence of “hardcore” listed restrictions). This has been the case in Germany ( KZB 75/21 , 2022), Sweden ( GE v. Natura Furniture , 2021), Belgium ( SNF v.
Brief Background to the Case Much has been written about the Yukos cases since arbitration proceedings were initiated by the Shareholders against Russia in 2005. Parties should however expect that a high threshold would apply for the Court finding “ special circumstances “, as in this case, the existence of a novel point (i.e.
Consistent with the decision in West Tankers Inc v RAS Riunione Adriatica di Sicurta SpA [2005] EWHC 454 (Comm) at [29], it was agreed that English law governed the transferability of MBA’s rights under the sale contract and whether MSI was entitled to bring the claim in its own name.
Key Principles of Arbitration Identified By the Seven-Judge Bench In deciding whether unstamped agreements are unenforceable, the Judgment considered the remit of courts at the threshold stage. 2005) 8 SCC 618] and National Insurance Co. The Judgment traces this judicial and legislative evolution from SBP & Co. Boghara Polyfab Pvt.
Moderator: Thomas Bowman , Former Deputy Secretary of Veterans Affairs (2017-2018), CEO, TGB Strategies Anthony Principi , Former Secretary of Veterans Affairs (2001- 2005), Principal, The Principi Group (confirmed) Dr. James Peake , M.D., The CMMC 2.0 According to the proposed rule, DoD plans to implement a phased rollout of CMMC.
18] And, for DoD, Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (“DFARS”) 216.203-4 limits the use of the FAR EPA clauses to DoD contracts that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (presently $250,000 with exceptions), and performance is longer than six months. [19] GAO’s competitive prejudice threshold should be similar.
For example, FAR 16.505(b)(1)(iii)(B)( 2 ) states, regarding an order that exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold, that a Contracting Officer shall “[a]fford all contractors responding to the notice a fair opportunity to submit an offer and have that offer fairly considered.” 2005 CPD ¶ 71, at 2 (Nov. 59] See id. 60] NIKA Tech.,
Indeed, the vaccine suppliers are immune from liability under Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act of 2005 (the “PREP Act”), and the Government’s liability for any vaccine injury is limited by the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (“CICP”), and the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“VICP”). [78]
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content