Remove 2006 Remove E-procurement Remove Quality
article thumbnail

The 3 revolutions of public procurement in Africa

Open Contracting Partnership

Public procurement is like the heartbeat of public spending in most of Africa – by some estimates, it accounts for 17% of the GDP of African Countries. Procurement was long seen as a clerical administrative function, rather than a strategic lever. This was not always the case.

article thumbnail

5G as a Digital Transformation Accelerant

FedInsider

For instance, the rapid adoption of edge computing can be attributed to 5G’s superior qualities. Certificates will be e-mailed to registrants. He had an extensive career in the Federal Government, with leadership responsibilities leading to numerous national level roles at the Senior Executive Service level since April 2006.

professionals

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Government Contracts Issues for a Recession

Procurement Notes

43] Moreover, it is higher than the peak of the housing bubble in April 2006, when the average house cost was 6.81 The Federal Government’s procurement spend in FY2023 was $765 billion ($470 billion for defense agencies), [106] and most of the procurement spend was discretionary spending. down from 5.5%

article thumbnail

Embracing Data-Driven Change to Enhance Customer Experiences

FedInsider

Certificates will be e-mailed to registrants. Barbara joined VA in 2006 as a Staff Attorney at the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board). In accordance with the standards of the National Registry of CPE Sponsors, 50 minutes equals 1 CPE. Roberts worked as a Functional Analyst Lead for contract writing at CACI, Inc.

Data 69
article thumbnail

An In-Depth Examination of Inflation Relief for a Government Contractor

Procurement Notes

34] And DFARS 252.216-7000(e) gives the Contracting Officer the option of terminating the cost-increase-impacted portion of the contract/order. [35] However, “[CICA sets forth no standard for determining when modification of an existing contract requires a new competition or falls within the scope of the original competitive procurement.” [57]