Remove 2012 Remove Balance Remove Bidder
article thumbnail

Risk of anti-competitive collusion after excessive level of transparency in public procurement debriefing?

European Law: Public Procurement

In its Judgment of 4 October 2012 in case C‑629/11 P Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission (ESP-ISEP) , the Court of Justice has issued another interesting decision on what should be considered sufficient debriefing of disappointed bidders in public procurement procedures. 1) (‘the Financial Regulation’).

article thumbnail

An In-Depth Examination of Inflation Relief for a Government Contractor

Procurement Notes

According to Deltek’s 2022 Government Contracting Industry Study , in 2021, “[m]edian profit margin was higher (15%) compared with what has been observed since 2012 (6-10%).” [10] Jones was not, to stand aside and let the bidder be overwhelmed without a warning.” [134] Now, compare the foregoing to contractor profits. 8, 2014).

article thumbnail

Duty to give reasons under EU procurement law and EU trademark law: is there a contradiction?

European Law: Public Procurement

In my reading, the position of the GC in Bimbo Doughnuts is a more balanced review of the reasons provided by the authority than in Sviluppo Globale, and the focus is ultimately functional. And this generates some troubling incentives and risks, as discussed here. GC T-569/10, at paras 39 to 46, emphasis added).