Remove 2012 Remove Balance Remove Quality
article thumbnail

The Contents of Journal of International Arbitration, Volume 41, Issue 4 (August 2024)

Kluwer Arbitration

Although existing tools aim to streamline proceedings, they often overlook root causes of inefficiency, including the tendency of parties and counsel to focus on enforceability and prioritize the right to present their case at its fullest, fearing that efficiency compromises quality.

article thumbnail

From the Editors of Kluwer Arbitration Blog: 2023

Kluwer Arbitration

At the outset, Gwen de Vries, Director Content and Market Development, Wolters Kluwer Legal & Regulatory, on behalf of the publisher, indicated that: … the blog should include frequent, high quality discussions on international arbitration in its broadest sense, thus including private and public arbitration.

Quality 59
professionals

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Deploy LLMs in AWS GovCloud (US) Regions using Hugging Face Inference Containers

AWS Public Sector

Select the option to view the custom policy in JSON format, then modify and paste the following code into the editor: { "Version": "2012-10-17", "Statement": [ { "Effect": "Allow", "Action": "s3:GetObject", "Resource": "arn:aws:s3::: /*" } ] } c. Converting the weights to a smaller representation affects the quality of the LLM output.

Data 78
article thumbnail

The Procurement Act 2023’s Kaleidoscopic View of the Public Interest

University of Bristol

From February 2025, it will introduce a new system of procurement regulation that is meant, among other goals, to create flexibility and to allow for a different balancing of competing considerations in guiding procurement in the public interest. It is thus interesting to see how the PA23 has articulated its view of the public interest.

article thumbnail

Risk of anti-competitive collusion after excessive level of transparency in public procurement debriefing?

European Law: Public Procurement

In its Judgment of 4 October 2012 in case C‑629/11 P Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission (ESP-ISEP) , the Court of Justice has issued another interesting decision on what should be considered sufficient debriefing of disappointed bidders in public procurement procedures. 1) (‘the Financial Regulation’).

article thumbnail

Duty to give reasons under EU procurement law and EU trademark law: is there a contradiction?

European Law: Public Procurement

In my reading, the position of the GC in Bimbo Doughnuts is a more balanced review of the reasons provided by the authority than in Sviluppo Globale, and the focus is ultimately functional. And this generates some troubling incentives and risks, as discussed here. GC T-569/10, at paras 39 to 46, emphasis added).

article thumbnail

Can artificial intelligence bring corruption in public procurement to an end?

University of Bristol

Moreover, the extent to which AI can deliver such improvements is highly dependent on existing limitations in data availability and quality. Of course, these are desirable improvements, but they should induce lower levels of expectation than the hopes for an AI-based transformation of anti-corruption mechanisms.