Remove 2012 Remove Tender Remove Transparency
article thumbnail

Risk of anti-competitive collusion after excessive level of transparency in public procurement debriefing?

European Law: Public Procurement

In its Judgment of 4 October 2012 in case C‑629/11 P Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission (ESP-ISEP) , the Court of Justice has issued another interesting decision on what should be considered sufficient debriefing of disappointed bidders in public procurement procedures. 1) (‘the Financial Regulation’).

article thumbnail

Chile’s procurement monitoring system now open to the public

Open Contracting Partnership

Chile’s public procurement agency, ChileCompra, created its “ Public Contracting Observatory ” service in 2012 to detect, prevent, and fix irregularities in government contracting procedures. million relates to open tendering processes that were awarded, US$17.7 Of these, US$19.5

professionals

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Updating the UNCITRAL Model Procurement Law for “Green Procurement”

Public Procurement Intl

Conclusion When the UNCITRAL model procurement law and its Guide to Enactment were concluded in 2012, “green procurement” was just emerging as a critical global imperative.

article thumbnail

The Procurement Act 2023’s Kaleidoscopic View of the Public Interest

University of Bristol

One could be forgiven for simplifying the goal of procurement to ensuring that public money is well spent , which could be further elaborated (following Schooner 2002 ) to encompass promoting integrity and value for money in the award of public contracts, and acting transparently to facilitate accountability. At first look, s.12(1)

article thumbnail

2023 Year in Review: Latin America and Investment Arbitration

Kluwer Arbitration

Fernandez Arroyo reported that this was an interesting development considering Venezuela’s denunciation of the ICSID Convention in 2012 and its concerns regarding the investment protection system. Corruption allegations in arbitration proceedings relating to Peru remain very common. Following the decision reported last year in Bacilio v.

article thumbnail

Duty to give reasons under EU procurement law and EU trademark law: is there a contradiction?

European Law: Public Procurement

For instance, some recent case law on the duty to provide reasons under each of the specific adminsitrative procedures that govern contract tendering and trademark registration shows what, in my view, is rather a contradiction. And this generates some troubling incentives and risks, as discussed here.

article thumbnail

The four key drivers that can enable better IT procurement

Open Contracting Partnership

More often than not, public procurement of technology is viewed as non-transparent, uncompetitive, poorly planned, inefficient, costly, and having high failure rates. There is research to show that every additional tenderer leads to a price reduction.