This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
On the other hand, the Conseil d’Etat considered that administrative courts would be competent to hear an application for exequatur of a foreign award ( CE, 19 April 2013, No. The Conseil d’Etat quickly dismissed the SMAC annulment request considering that it could not annul a decision rendered by a foreign tribunal. 12/11596 ).
Taking this into consideration, as well as the volume of GSA Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) contracts and thereby source competition afforded the federal acquisition community, it’s quite interesting how the FAR prescribes “order set-asides.” appropriately influenced economies of scale.
Taking this into consideration, as well as the volume of GSA Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) contracts and thereby source competition afforded the federal acquisition community, it’s quite interesting how the FAR prescribes “order set-asides.” appropriately influenced economies of scale.
for tortious interference with a contract), etc. Procurement Remedies Starting with a procurementcontract, there are multiple recourses to Government non-payment. if a specific payment date is not established by contract. [2] if a specific payment date is not established by contract. [4] 2d 151, 164 (D.
How We Got Here DoD has focused on regulating the cyber requirements of contracts over the last decade, culminating in this proposed rule. DFARS clause 252.204-7012 (DFARS 7012) was first introduced in 2013 and modified several times with the DoD setting a mandatory implementation deadline of December 31, 2017.
In this case, the court concluded that the dispute was related to the performance of the contracts, not their amendment and, thus, is arbitrable. [X] X] Belastingadviseur B.V., Court of Appeal of Amsterdam, Nr.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content