This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Source: Governmentwide Category Management Dashboard via General Services Administration Thats a far cry from where things stood in 2014, when it was more of a norm for multiple federal agencies to have similar contracts for identical purchases, sometimes from the same vendor and sometimes without realizing it. Governmentwide, 13.6%
Both the European Union ( Directive 2014/24/EU , Art. One solution would be to bring Article 10 into line with Article 43 of EU Directive 2014/24/EU , to ensure that eco-labels: (a) concern only “criteria which are linked to the subject-matter of the contract and are appropriate to define characteristics.
Procurement thus heavily influences the interaction between the State’s contractual agents and citizens, and becomes a tool for the regulation of public service delivery. This relates to discussions in other areas and to the broader expectation that procurement can be a trend setter and influence industry practice and standards.
However, the tribunal did find that Mongolia breached the fair and equitable treatment protection in the BIT by taking ownership of the gold, exporting it abroad for refining, and depositing it or its value in an unallocated account in England to increase the country’s currency reserves. In 2020, the mining sector accounted for 21.6%
While the Memo is directed at agencies and does not impose new requirements on contractors directly, those providing AI products and services could soon see it influence contract requirements, source selection evaluation criteria, and contract terms. James Peake , M.D.,
This part of the dispute concerned the definition of ‘public works contracts’ under Directive 2014/24/EU (issue 1). Framing: Directive 2004/18/EC, Directive 2014/24/EU, or it does not matter? This part of the dispute thus concerns the effect of State aid decisions relating to aid packages with a procurement element (issue 2).
But the Council doesn’t meet very often and no one at the top seems to pay any attention, according to the Government Accountability Office (GAO). It was formed in relation to a GAO recommendation back in 2014. Actually, it goes even further back than 2014. Travis Masters Yeah, that’s right, Tom. Tom Temin Right.
The lack of an alternative route adds a layer of complexity, especially as it has been observed that since 2014 and the invasion of Crimea, Russian Courts’ independence has regressed, at the expense of non-Russian parties. Damage claims are renowned for their inherent complexity, it is thus imperative to prepare for it preemptively.
For example, there is the black box problem, where the lack of transparency in AIs decision-making processes raises accountability concerns by making it difficult to understand how the AI tool reached its conclusion. The Act emphasizes transparency, safety, and accountability, and aims to lay a foundation for responsible AI use.
Ecuador) in 2014. For the Tribunal, Ecuador’s conduct – not only in the May 2018 ‘Settlement Agreement’ but also in its actions following the signing of the contracts and the 2014 arbitration – took place within this ‘circle of interests’ shared by the opposing parties.
This could strengthen personal or professional ties and influence the decision-making process. should not be applied rigidly, but taking into account the specifics of each case, particularly the stage of the proceedings, should be considered in a balanced legal analysis. Therefore, Section 3.2.13
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content