This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Two recently announced Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) settlements involving reinsurance companies demonstrate what happens when the rubber hits the road. Jardine Lloyd Thompson Group Holdings Ltd.
04/L-220 on Foreign Investment (hereinafter, the “2014 Law on Foreign Investment”), which safeguarded foreign investors as a key element in promoting international economic cooperation and attracting foreign capital, has now been replaced by Law No. Kosovo Law No.
As several objectives of the 2014 reform remain unattained, we conclude that, the entry into force of the 2014 directives has had no demonstrable effect. (…) Also, as publication rates remain low, transparency, a key safeguard against the risk of fraud and corruption, is negatively affected. Its deadline was 18 April 2019.
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced a $100 million settlement with global software company SAP SE over charges of violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). anti-corruption law that prohibits the payment of anything of value to foreign government officials in order to obtain a business advantage.
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Office of the Whistleblower posted a Notice of Covered Action (NoCA) for a $100 million settlement with global software company SAP SE over charges of violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). The NoCA signals that the SEC is now accepting whistleblower award claims for the case.
On its part, the Respondent raised several objections to the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, specifically pointing to several instances of corrupt and illegal acts allegedly committed by Worley at the making and during the operation of the investment. Worley may have willfully failed to monitor and investigate Tecnazul’s corrupt activities.
These and other constraints under the model law are commendable anti-corruption measures, but may make it more difficult to accommodate emerging “green procurement” approaches. Both the European Union ( Directive 2014/24/EU , Art. Article 8, for example, warns the procuring agency, “when first soliciting the participation of.
Not only was the whistleblowers’ information key for resolving alleged misuse of Medicare Part B between 2014 and 2017, but they also assisted the settlement of “false claims to Medicare by billing for diagnostic imaging procedures” from 2014 to 2021. These acts went against the Stark Law, or the Physician Self-Referral Law.
Background Facts In 2014, an arbitrator rendered an award, entitled “Final Award”, holding York International Pte Ltd (“York”) liable to Voltas Limited (“Voltas”) for sums amounting “up to a maximum of” SGD 1,132,439.46 (“2014 Award”). In 2020, Voltas sought a further award from the arbitrator on whether this sum was payable.
The lost decade: EU Auditor Helga Berger painted a sobering picture: we’ve lost a decade of progress in European procurement despite 2014 Directives. Data-powered red flags strengthen efforts to fight corruption. All this will likely lead to revised public procurement directives. This trend started long before Covid.
Additionally, the Municipalidad de Lima claimed that Odebrecht had made two payments in 2014 to secure the Bankability Addendum to the contract. It found that neither the contract nor the addendum was void due to the corruption allegations. In 2020, the arbitral tribunal rendered its decision. Moreover, the D.C.
Hydro-Québec, 2014 QCCA 948. Hydro-Québec, 2014 QCCA 948. More from our authors: Dealing with Bribery and Corruption in International Commercial Arbitration: To Probe or Not to Probe by Emmanuel Obiora Igbokwe € 190 Arbitration in Egypt: A Practitioner's Guide by Ibrahim Shehata € 190 Probuild [2021] VSC 849.
In this context it is important to recall that bias is not used in a pejorative sense, rather it means the absence of demonstrated independence and impartiality ( Yiacoub v The Queen [2014] UKPC 22 ). The views expressed in this post are the author’s own.
While the Polish Supreme Court decided in 2012 that the enforcement of MSC’s mortgage for one apartment violated the principles of social co-existence, it decided in 2014 that MSC’s enforcement of the mortgage for another apartment did not violate these principles. 28 November 2014, C.12.0517.N
Erica Stein (Stein Arbitration) noted that this year the IBA Arbitration Committee constituted a task force to revise the 2014 IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest. Kostytska pointed to the added difficulty in a scenario when neither party raises corruption, but it is the “elephant in the room” that the deal does not make sense.
David is the founder of reAcción , a grassroots anti-corruption civil society organization that empowers young people in Paraguay to fight for government transparency and social accountability. I work in anti-corruption, leading an organization that focuses on the education sector in Paraguay.
First published in 2004 (the “2004 IBA Guidelines”) and then revised in 2014 (the “2014 IBA Guidelines”) (collectively, the “IBA Guidelines”), the IBA Guidelines have become a go-to guide for arbitrators, counsel, and arbitral institutions in identifying conflicts of interest and assessing the need for disclosure.
More from our authors: Dealing with Bribery and Corruption in International Commercial Arbitration: To Probe or Not to Probe by Emmanuel Obiora Igbokwe € 190 Arbitration in Egypt: A Practitioner's Guide by Ibrahim Shehata € 190
XX/2014, 27 March 2016 Ismail Selim, ITA Reporter for the Cairo Regional Center for International Commercial Arbitration (CRCICA) In CRCICA Case No. XX/2014 (Operator v. An Operator of the Relevant Industry (“First Operator”) v. Another Operator of the Relevant Industry (“Second Operator”) (Award), CRCICA Case No. Claimant v.
To provide a brief overview, in 2014, an arbitral tribunal seated in The Hague found that Russia had unlawfully expropriated Yukos’ assets in breach of the Energy Charter Treaty (“ ECT “) and awarded more than US$50 billion in damages to the Shareholders. and England.
The investor-Maya Dangelas was born in Vietnam and became a naturalised American citizen in 2014, which made the basis of rationae personae jurisdictional objection by Vietnam before the tribunal. In 2014, the majority of the tribunal had upheld its jurisdiction.
Altomart Limited [2014] WLR(D) 536 (“ Salford ”) at [41]. Altomart Limited [2014] EWCA Civ 1575 and reiterated by the High Court of Justice in Telnic Ltd v. . Altomart Limited [2014] WLR(D) 536 (“ Salford ”) at [41]. 2) Limited v. and discourage parties from bypassing arbitration by presenting winding up petitions.
3475-2014, Constitutional Court of Guatemala, Decision of December 9, 2014): Companies, its bodies and shareholders may arbitrate matters that “for convenience, pertinence and opportunity are beneficial to the corporate purpose and the activity of the company.”
Louis Dreyfus Armatures SAS & Ors , 2014 SCC OnLine Cal 17695. Meanwhile, the Calcutta High Court asserted that the Indian Arbitration Act does apply to investment arbitration awards 3) The Board of Trustees of the Port of Kolkata v.
This decision mirrors the approach in other states, such as New York, 3) See the 2014 New York Supreme Court Ruling to quash nonparty subpoenas in Empire State Building v. ↑ 3 See the 2014 New York Supreme Court Ruling to quash nonparty subpoenas in Empire State Building v. New York Skyline, Inc. Section 1283.05 5th at 401.
The Crimean Cases After Russia took control of Crimea in 2014, a number of Ukrainian nationals started arbitral proceedings against Russia under the Russia-Ukraine BIT, seeking compensation for alleged losses incurred in relation to investments made in the region.
In both arbitrations, Lima responded by arguing among other things that the Concession Contract and its modifications were void due to corruption. Finally, the Court rejected Lima’s argument that both awards violated the United States’ public policy regarding enforcing or procuring contracts through corruption. Société Indagro v.
XX/2014 (Operator v. More from our authors: Dealing with Bribery and Corruption in International Commercial Arbitration: To Probe or Not to Probe by Emmanuel Obiora Igbokwe € 190 Arbitration in Egypt: A Practitioner's Guide by Ibrahim Shehata € 190 Second Industry Operator (Award), CRCICA Case No.
Temnikov, A Procrustean Bed: Pre- and Post-award Interest in ICSID Arbitrations, ICSID Review, 2014, Vol. More from our authors: Dealing with Bribery and Corruption in International Commercial Arbitration: To Probe or Not to Probe by Emmanuel Obiora Igbokwe € 190 Arbitration in Egypt: A Practitioner's Guide by Ibrahim Shehata € 190
2014) enforced a supplemental award restraining the respondent to satisfy an interim award with escrowed funds. More from our authors: Dealing with Bribery and Corruption in International Commercial Arbitration: To Probe or Not to Probe by Emmanuel Obiora Igbokwe € 190 Arbitration in Egypt: A Practitioner's Guide by Ibrahim Shehata € 190
More from our authors: Dealing with Bribery and Corruption in International Commercial Arbitration: To Probe or Not to Probe by Emmanuel Obiora Igbokwe € 190 Arbitration in Egypt: A Practitioner's Guide by Ibrahim Shehata € 190 What he rendered in 2022 was an award in form only; it was not an “arbitral award” within the meaning of the NYC.
10/2014/QD-PQTT dated 28 October 2014 (“ Decision No. More from our authors: Dealing with Bribery and Corruption in International Commercial Arbitration: To Probe or Not to Probe by Emmanuel Obiora Igbokwe € 190 Arbitration in Egypt: A Practitioner's Guide by Ibrahim Shehata € 190 ↑ 4 Article 68.2(b)
For example, the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center, which specializes in the resolution of IP and technology disputes, has recently seen a significant increase in cases – from 71 new cases in 2014 to 679 new cases in 2023.
More from our authors: Dealing with Bribery and Corruption in International Commercial Arbitration: To Probe or Not to Probe by Emmanuel Obiora Igbokwe € 190 Arbitration in Egypt: A Practitioner's Guide by Ibrahim Shehata € 190
In so doing, the Privy Council overruled the leading English authority Salford Estates (No 2) Ltd v Altomart Ltd (No 2) [2014] EWCA Civ 1575 (“ Salford Estates ”) on this issue. Instead, the correct test to be applied by the court in the exercise of its discretion is whether the relevant debt is disputed on genuine and substantial grounds.
Hamama led a discussion regarding Russia’s annexation of Crimea and the Donbas region in 2014, outlining the solid ground it created for claiming damages and compensation, and noted that similar claims have emerged following the Russia-Ukraine war in 2022.
Following an award on jurisdiction and liability in 2014 , in CGC’s favour, and several unsuccessful challenges by NIOC under s.67 In 2003, CPCIL assigned its rights under the GSPC to its wholly owned subsidiary, CGC. NIOC failed to supply any gas pursuant to the GSPC. Therefore, CGC commenced arbitral proceedings pursuant to the GSPC.
Al-Warraq v Republic of Indonesia , UNCITRAL, Final Award (15 December 2014), para. More from our authors: Dealing with Bribery and Corruption in International Commercial Arbitration: To Probe or Not to Probe by Emmanuel Obiora Igbokwe € 190 Arbitration in Egypt: A Practitioner's Guide by Ibrahim Shehata € 190
Gazprom justified this limitation with reference to Article 5n of Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 , which prohibits EU lawyers and law firms from providing legal services to Russian entities (with certain exceptions); Gazprom can only de facto claim justice in Russia. Gazprom invoked Articles 248.1
More from our authors: Dealing with Bribery and Corruption in International Commercial Arbitration: To Probe or Not to Probe by Emmanuel Obiora Igbokwe € 190 Arbitration in Egypt: A Practitioner's Guide by Ibrahim Shehata € 190 by incurring in arbitrary and discriminatory measures, and illegally expropriated Claimant’s investment (Art.
In 2013 and 2014, Spain abrogated these measures and replaced them with regulations providing less benefits to investors. Facts In 2007 and 2008, Spain adopted a series of measures to encourage investments in renewable energies. Under this regime, EDF Energies Nouvelles S.A. (“EDF”)
Gox platform, a Tokyo-based Bitcoin exchange, that abruptly vanished in 2014. More from our authors: Dealing with Bribery and Corruption in International Commercial Arbitration: To Probe or Not to Probe by Emmanuel Obiora Igbokwe € 190 Arbitration in Egypt: A Practitioner's Guide by Ibrahim Shehata € 190
More from our authors: Dealing with Bribery and Corruption in International Commercial Arbitration: To Probe or Not to Probe by Emmanuel Obiora Igbokwe € 190 Arbitration in Egypt: A Practitioner's Guide by Ibrahim Shehata € 190 Mr. Xavier highlighted CBAr’s initiatives towards the promotion of CISG’s application in Brazil.
In September 2014, a three-member arbitral tribunal issued the final award (“ Award ”) directing Avitel, its founder, and directors (“ Award Debtors ”) to pay USD 60 million as damages to HSBC. However, HSBC subsequently discovered that the invested money was siphoned off to different companies which led to the arbitration.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content