Remove 2014 Remove Corruption Remove Thresholds
article thumbnail

European Court of Auditors publishes report on public procurement

Telles.eu

As several objectives of the 2014 reform remain unattained, we conclude that, the entry into force of the 2014 directives has had no demonstrable effect. (…) Also, as publication rates remain low, transparency, a key safeguard against the risk of fraud and corruption, is negatively affected. Its deadline was 18 April 2019.

article thumbnail

Looking into Antonio Costa legacy as PM from a procurement perspective

Telles.eu

With today's announcement of his resignation on the back of a corruption probe, the time of Antonio Costa as Portuguese Prime-Minister reached its end. The transposition of the 2014 Directives His first government transposed the 2014 Directives fashionably late in August 2017. But fashionably late it was nonetheless.

professionals

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Updating the UNCITRAL Model Procurement Law for “Green Procurement”

Public Procurement Intl

These and other constraints under the model law are commendable anti-corruption measures, but may make it more difficult to accommodate emerging “green procurement” approaches. Both the European Union ( Directive 2014/24/EU , Art. Article 8, for example, warns the procuring agency, “when first soliciting the participation of.

article thumbnail

Pakistani Energy Sector Parties Challenge Arbitration Awards in the English High Court on the Grounds of ‘Serious Irregularity’

Kluwer Arbitration

Serious Irregularity The leading authority on Section 68 challenges is RAV Bahamas Ltd and another v Therapy Beach Club Inc [2021] UKPC 8 , which prescribes that intervention should be limited to ‘extreme’ cases and that the test of serious irregularity imposes a ‘high threshold’.

article thumbnail

Arbitration Agreements and Insolvency Proceedings: Comparing the Pro-Arbitration Perspectives in Singapore, the United Kingdom, and India, and Calling for International Consensus

Kluwer Arbitration

Altomart Limited [2014] WLR(D) 536 (“ Salford ”) at [41]. Altomart Limited [2014] EWCA Civ 1575 and reiterated by the High Court of Justice in Telnic Ltd v. Altomart Limited [2014] WLR(D) 536 (“ Salford ”) at [41]. 2) Limited v. and discourage parties from bypassing arbitration by presenting winding up petitions. 2) Limited v.

article thumbnail

Sovereign Immunity and Issue Estoppel: English High Court’s Latest Decision in the Longstanding Yukos v. Russia Enforcement Saga

Kluwer Arbitration

To provide a brief overview, in 2014, an arbitral tribunal seated in The Hague found that Russia had unlawfully expropriated Yukos’ assets in breach of the Energy Charter Treaty (“ ECT “) and awarded more than US$50 billion in damages to the Shareholders. and England.

article thumbnail

Serious Irregularity for Failure to Consider a Limitation Defence: Lessons from Djanogly v Djanogly

Kluwer Arbitration

DL issued various informal rulings in 2014, known as Psak Din. The threshold is undoubtedly high and such instances are few and far between; indeed, the Commercial Court Report of 2022-2023 highlighted a decrease in the numbers of challenges to arbitration award under s. 67-69 of the 1996 Act.