This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
On its part, the Respondent raised several objections to the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, specifically pointing to several instances of corrupt and illegal acts allegedly committed by Worley at the making and during the operation of the investment. Worley may have willfully failed to monitor and investigate Tecnazul’s corrupt activities.
In 2016, Pakistan asked the World Bank (which facilitated the negotiations preceding the Indus Water Treaty) to facilitate an ad-hoc Court of Arbitration to investigate its concerns about the designs of the two hydroelectric power projects. India asked for the appointment of a Neutral Expert for the same purpose.
Since its inception in 2015, the ICC BAD has enjoyed consistent success, and in 2024 arbitration practicing lawyers and clients had further reasons to celebrate: the 10 th anniversary of ICC Brasil. Federal legislation dictates that, except for cases of willful misconduct and corruption, managers are not held responsible for agreements.
This, however, is not the most interesting aspect of the discussion, as the revision of the Brazilian Arbitration Act in 2015 buried most discussions in that regard and both the Contract and the Notice contained clear arbitration agreements. Pursuant to Municipal Decree No.
He observed that a lot has changed since the Conference of Parties 21 in 2015, and noted the increased criticism of ISDS as a mechanism used to direct claims against environmental reforms. Rowley, KC observed that treaties have to be negotiated like contracts. of the India EFTA Trade and Economic Partnership (“TEP”).
This discussion resulted in the Arbitration and Conciliation Act being amended in 2015 to clarify that foreign awards would only be considered contrary to public policy if, for example, the award was affected by fraud or corruption or contravened the fundamental policy of Indian law.
In 2015, an instrument prepared under the auspices of the African Union and labeled the “ Pan-African Investment Code ” reflected many of the above features to reform international investment law within Africa. These features, however, are not new. Similarly, Article 46.1
Compared with the 2015 Rules , the 2024 Rules have expanded from 84 provisions to 88 provisions and incorporated recent developments in international arbitration, such as third-party funding (Article 48) and early dismissal (Article 50). The 2024 Rules apply to CIETAC arbitrations commenced on or after this date.
The government attorney, appointed as arbitrator by Petros, had previously acted under several capacities, between 2010 and 2015, at the governmental entity Superintendência Nacional de Previdência Complementar (“Previc”). In addition, given the involvement of a government attorney in this case, Laws n. 73/1993 and n.
Concluding Remarks Small island states were instrumental in the drafting of Article 8 of the 2015 Paris Agreement which recognises the importance of “averting, minimizing and addressing loss and damage associated with the adverse effects of climate change.” Article 8 stops short of providing a basis for any liability or compensation.
There was a marked preference for arbitration (whether contractual or treaty-based) over other dispute resolution mechanisms such as mediation, direct negotiation, government intervention, and litigation in the host state’s courts.
The Dispute In March 2015, Dassault entered into an English law sale contract with its Japanese distributor, Mitsui Bussan Aerospace Co Ltd (“ MBA ”), which in turn contracted with the Japanese Coast Guard (“ JCG ”) as the end customer. However, the availability of de novo review under s.
The agreements were not drafted, negotiated, or signed by the father or his sons. s birth certificate since 2015. The SFSC found that the sole arbitrator rightly affirmed his jurisdiction. Within the group, the companies concluded several loan agreements and a debt assumption agreement. In 2018, A.’s
More from our authors: Dealing with Bribery and Corruption in International Commercial Arbitration: To Probe or Not to Probe by Emmanuel Obiora Igbokwe € 190 Arbitration in Egypt: A Practitioner's Guide by Ibrahim Shehata € 190 This ruling is significant when juxtaposed with the provisions of the Hong Kong Arbitration Ordinance (Cap.
The Voices of Developing States in Multilateral Fora Ladan Mehranvar kicked off the discussion by presenting the findings of her upcoming empirical paper on the attendance and participation of government delegations in the WGIII negotiations.
So instead, from 2015, the Singapore International Arbitration Centre and the Singapore International Mediation Centre developed an Arb-Med-Arb protocol involving separate processes and neutrals, which has attracted a few dozen cases. This was not popular in practice. Most now answer more affirmatively (see e.g., here ).
However, such developments do open up the possibility of Australia advancing an “investment court” alternative to ISDS when reviewing older IIAs and negotiating new ones. An EU-style investment court or key features can be a useful discussion point for Australia and its counterparties to IIAs.
See, e.g., Brazil-India BIT (2020) ; Brazil-Ethiopia BIT (2018) ; Brazil-Malawi BIT (2015).) In 2014, South Africa terminated its BITs with six European countries and in 2015 passed the Protection of Investment Act (“PIA”) , which will eventually replace all BITs. The PIA, which came into effect in 2018, introduced several changes.
The carve-out was not among the closed list of topics for negotiation approved by the Energy Charter Conference in 2019. Neither was it included in the EU Council’s original negotiating mandate or in the initial EU proposal.
More recent advancements in Mongolia’s international investment initiatives include the Canada-Mongolia BIT (2016) and Japan-Mongolia Economic Partnership Agreement (2015) (which replaced and superseded the Japan-Mongolia BIT (2001) ). million in 2015. million to $4.5 billion in 2013 and further dropping to less than $95.0
In 2005, Romania repealed the tax incentives scheme in order to align its legislation with the acquis communautaire in the context of the negotiations for its accession to the EU.
Facts In 2015, DJO was negotiating various contracts for the operation of a network of railway lines in India. While setting-aside applications do not generally succeed given the well-established principle of minimal curial intervention, the Court undoubtedly reached the right decision in setting aside the award in this case.
However, as the pervasive abuses of direct awards under the emergency conditions generated by the covid pandemic evidenced in virtually all jurisdictions, dispensing with those requirements, checks and balances comes with a very high price tag for taxpayers in terms of corruption, favouritism, and wastage of public funds.
Procedurally, the clause was embedded in fine print and drafted in a way that disadvantaged the consumer, making it difficult to understand or negotiate. Similarly, in the United Kingdom, the Consumer Rights Act 2015 introduced provisions to ensure that arbitration clauses do not disproportionately disadvantage consumers. In Wilson v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content