This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This decision can be seen as an application of its approach in Fosmax ( CE, 9 November 2016, No. for public entities to arbitrate disputes relating to the financial performance of public works and supply contracts ( Article L. 1900269 ) and by the Administrative Court of Appeal of Bordeaux ( CAA Bordeaux, 30 March 2022, No.
In both arbitrations, Lima responded by arguing among other things that the Concession Contract and its modifications were void due to corruption. Finally, the Court rejected Lima’s argument that both awards violated the United States’ public policy regarding enforcing or procuringcontracts through corruption.
First, the Guidelines note that arbitration should not be automatically included in procurementcontracts, particularly large contracts. It is therefore not surprising that the Model BIT 2016 did not find many takers. Interestingly, the India – UAE BIT 2024 departs from the Model BIT 2016 in a few key ways.
First, the Guidelines note that arbitration should not be automatically included in procurementcontracts, particularly large contracts. It is therefore not surprising that the Model BIT 2016 did not find many takers. Interestingly, the India – UAE BIT 2024 departs from the Model BIT 2016 in a few key ways.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content