This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
As several objectives of the 2014 reform remain unattained, we conclude that, the entry into force of the 2014 directives has had no demonstrable effect. (…) Also, as publication rates remain low, transparency, a key safeguard against the risk of fraud and corruption, is negatively affected. Its deadline was 18 April 2019.
To make it easier to incorporate “green procurement” into procurement planning, the UNCITRAL model law might be amended to: Article 7 – Flexible Communications: Make it easier to change means of communication during the course of a procurement. system) hinge on vendors’ “green” initiatives has long been a very controversial approach.
Wearing a second hat as an author of an article, Gaillard strongly criticised the SGS II approach. Therefore, Gaillard’s same conviction regarding umbrella clause travelled from his written memorial as a “counsel” to an article as a “scholar” further to an award as an “arbitrator” within a span of two years.
“Passing the $2 billion threshold in whistleblower awards is a major milestone for the Dodd-Frank whistleblower programs and a testament to how they have revolutionized the enforcement of white-collar crime,” said whistleblower attorney Stephen M. derivatives markets,” wrote Kohn in an article calling for the passage of the bill.
This article considers the reasons why parties often choose to seat their arbitration in a foreign jurisdiction, looking in particular at commercial contracts in Pakistan with an arbitration clause seating the dispute in London. of the GSA, were factually radically different to the issues in the QAPTL case.
Under this doctrine, the general principle of immunity applies only to the sovereign acts of a State, and not to the commercial acts (Article 10, United Nations Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Their Property ). 3(1)(a) and the ‘arbitration exception’ under s.9(1).
In instances of active waste, such suboptimal decisions are motivated by personal gain, as exemplified by corruption. This continuous data flow strengthens public trust by minimizing corruption risks and reaffirming a commitment to transparency. Waste broadly refers to suboptimal decision-making in the allocation of public resources.
DOJ’s Focus on Financial Crime and Corruption Although the Attorney General was already authorized to pay awards for information or assistance that lead to civil or criminal forfeitures—and did so on occasion—the sharpening of this tool as part of a targeted program demonstrates DOJ’s continued effort to crack down on corporate misconduct.
KS&T Did not Have a Qualifying Investment NAFTA Article 1139(g) NAFTA Article 1139(g) defines “investment” as “real estate or other property, tangible or intangible, acquired in the expectation or used for the purpose of economic benefit or other business purposes.”
In KlimaSeniorinnen , the Court held 16:1 (Judge Eicke dissenting) that Article 8 ECHR (right to private and family life) encompasses a right to effective protection from—and a corresponding duty (or “positive obligation”) on States to mitigate—the serious adverse effects of climate change on human lives and health.
In the other arbitration, Aynès’ law firm had raised serious corruption allegations against high-level Iranian officials and was collaborating with Crescent’s lead counsel. The Court recalled that proving actual bias is not necessary to succeed with an application for revision under Article 190(1)(c) PILA.
Thus, he considers the primary rule of treaty interpretation in Article 31(1) of the VCLT, explains that the language used does not assist in ensuring consistency in treaty interpretation, and that the absence of guidance gives a wide-ranging and unguided discretion to interpreters.
The Declaration purports to be an international legal instrument issued pursuant to paras (1) and (2) of Article 17 of the ECT. The Proposal and Declaration purport to be based on Articles 207 and 218(9) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (the “ TFEU ”). Does the Proposal Have a Sound Basis in EU Law?
Clarifying the Application of the arbitrateAD Rules The arbitrateAD Rules apply to any arbitration commenced on or after 1 February 2024 where the parties have agreed to submit their dispute: 1) Article 1(1) under the arbitrateAD Rules; to arbitrateAD; or to the Abu Dhabi Chamber of Commerce. 34 in 2021 , 3) Article 6a of Decree No.
The 2023 SCCA Arbitration Rules (commented on in a previous blog post ) increased the threshold amount in dispute for expedited proceedings to approximately USD 1.07 million – a response to the growing criticism directed at DIAC’s significantly lower threshold of around USD 270,000. million in value. 34 of 2021 (“ Decree No.
Hanotiau found a creeping indirect expropriation of Clorox’s investment by Venezuela without adequate compensation under article V of the bilateral investment treaty between Venezuela and Spain (the “BIT”) and awarded Clorox roughly USD 104 million. This includes preliminary questions of substance affecting the decision on jurisdiction (cf.
The Claimants alleged that Spain had thereby breached its obligations of fair and equitable treatment under the Energy Charter Treaty 1994 (“ECT”) and commenced an ICSID arbitration pursuant to Article 26 of the ECT. The same applies to the ECT for that matter, which expressly incorporates ICSID in article 26. 3) [2000] 1 AC 147.
15) of 2023 (“Amendment Law”), specific amendments have been introduced to key articles of the Federal Arbitration Law No. (6) 6) of 2018 (“UAE Arbitration Law”), a legislation comprising of 61 articles which stands as the cornerstone of arbitration regulations within the UAE. Under the recently issued Federal Law No. (15)
Functional Jurisdiction of the Competent Court The Appellant’s second challenge concerned the interpretation and application of Article 226 of the UAE Federal Law No. In dismissing this challenge, the CoC held that Article 226 primarily addresses territorial (or geographical) jurisdiction.
This relates to the facts of the case, the Respondent’s litigation strategy and, most importantly, the invoked security exception clause in Article 22.2 This relates to the facts of the case, the Respondent’s litigation strategy and, most importantly, the invoked security exception clause in Article 22.2
Indeed, a party willing to bring an annulment action before a regional High Court of Justice must allege and prove one of the six grounds for annulment provided under article 41 of the SAL , which essentially mirror those set out in Article 34 of the Model Law, including the award being contrary to public policy. f of the SAL.
His other suggestions included giving the Maritime and Commercial High Court jurisdiction for invalidity questions, and applying option 1 of Article 7 of the 2006 amendments so that it is clear that an arbitration agreement shall be in writing. 2016.1558/2H), which sets a high threshold for any setting aside arguments.
Commonly, the grounds for annulment are similar to the grounds for refusing to recognize an award under Article V of the New York Convention ( e.g. , Article 34 of the UNCITRAL Model Law ). It does not give unfettered discretion to the court to adjudicate outside the ambit of Article V(2)(b).
Aurangzeb J next held that the Convention does not differentiate between interim or final awards and in the particular case, as per Article 2(v) of the ICC Rules, an award includes interim, partial or final awards. Rather, under Article V(1)(e) of the Convention, enforcement may be refused if the award has not yet become “binding.”
First, the Amicus argues that a US court must make “its own determination that an arbitration agreement exists” as a “threshold” matter of determining its jurisdiction under FSIA. The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Stephen Benz, associate at BakerHostetler LLP, in preparing this article. Amicus at 10, 16).
This article explores the rising risk of disputes in the tech sector (whether before domestic courts or under international law) and the need for both investors and States to carefully consider their strategies. See, e.g., China-Saudi Arabia BIT, Article 8(2) ; China-UK BIT, Article 7 ; China-Japan BIT, Article 11(2).
In this respect, the drafting of the rules is very broad, with article R27 providing that “ Such disputes may involve matters of principle relating to sport or matters of pecuniary or other interests relating to the practice or the development of sport and may include, more generally, any activity or matter related or connected to sport ”.
Article 34 of the Mining Code establishes that no exploration and exploitation can be performed in areas declared and delimited by environmental authorities as “protected areas,” called “mining exclusion zones.” The tribunal ruled that FET should not be taken as a standalone principle and must not go beyond the scope of MST.
Article 34 of the Mining Code establishes that no exploration and exploitation can be performed in areas declared and delimited by environmental authorities as “protected areas,” called “mining exclusion zones.” The tribunal ruled that FET should not be taken as a self-standing standard, it is part of MST and must not go beyond its scope.
These grounds replicate Article V of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards 1958 (“ New York Convention ”) and include public policy, arbitrability of the dispute, and composition of the arbitral tribunal, amongst others.
Furthermore, in most cases, the only material requirement for obtaining a declaration under section 1032(2) ZPO is the existence of a valid arbitration agreement, a threshold arguably less onerous than the considerations regarding the suitability of the forum that may inform the issuance of anti-suit injunctions.
He concluded by recalling the economic analysis of law reading of tort law as a threshold to identify acceptable risks, which seems to make it a particularly suitable tool in the fight against climate change. of the Paris Agreement.
This article does not aim to go over the recently published Guidelines in their entirety. More from our authors: Dealing with Bribery and Corruption in International Commercial Arbitration: To Probe or Not to Probe by Emmanuel Obiora Igbokwe € 190 Arbitration in Egypt: A Practitioner's Guide by Ibrahim Shehata € 190
Managing the Costs of Experts in Arbitration The second panel first addressed the issue of whether there is a threshold of damages that warrants retaining an expert witness. The panelists were unanimous in stating that the need for an expert depends not on the monetary value, but the complexity of the case.
Faced with the same threshold question in Brentwood , the Beijing Court directly applied the “seat standard” and decided that it had supervisory jurisdiction over the ICC award rendered in Beijing. The Beijing Court then proceeded to review the set-aside challenges brought by the claimant.
Such framing sets a higher threshold for establishing a violation of FET. But unlike the fair administrative treatment in the PIA, the standard under Article 14 does not, at least explicitly, protect investors from arbitrary or manifestly arbitrary measures. The cited document is the January 2023 draft version of the Protocol.
Hioureas further highlighted the approach adopted by a minority of ICSID tribunals to lower the threshold of exercising jurisdiction over SOEs by “implicit” designation, posing a dilemma for States given its incompatibility with the plain text of the ICSID convention and principles of State consent.
Expanding on Article 28 of the ICC Rules, Farah emphasised that interim reliefs are only issued if there is a threat of irreparable harm. Balfaqeeh then presented an in-depth analysis of the threshold for interim reliefs, particularly under the UAE Arbitration Law.
This provision of the NDAA seems targeted at bridging the communication gap between the agencies by requiring that the parties to a proposed transaction over the HSR threshold provide a copy of their HSR filing directly to DoD. View the full article
This article cuts through complexity to address when sole sourcing is necessary, the justification process, and how to manage the associated risks. For procurements exceeding specified thresholds, justification must document the effort to find alternative suppliers, listing unique technical requirements and companies contacted.
2020Na62481, 02 November 2021 Hyunyang Koo and Minjae Yoo, Lee & Ko, ITA Reporters for South Korea Under Article 168(1) and 170 of the Korean Civil Code, a claim raised in judicial proceedings has the effect of interrupting statute of limitation. A high threshold is applicable to s. Société Kraydon Ltd v. Matters falling within s.68(2)(g)
In the case of Parkdenton Ltd v Euro General Retail Ltd t/a EuroGiant [2024] IEHC 387 (Nolan J) a set aside application pursuant to two of the four grounds as per Article 34 of the UNCITRAL Model Law was rejected by the High Court. 2(a)(ii) and s.2(a)(iii) 2(a)(iii) respectively).
Key Amendments to QICCA Arbitration Rules Consolidation and Joinder Provisions A major change in the 2024 Rules is the introduction of Articles 10 and 21 , which allow consolidation of multiple arbitrations and joinder of third parties. Article 10 of the 2024 Rules introduces a new mechanism for consolidating arbitrations. Article 4.9
In the absence of party agreement, London is also the default seat of arbitration (Article 16.2 Such default position already features in the LCIA Rules (Article 16.4) Specifically, Article 5.5 Similarly, the Early Determination provisions in Article 22.1(viii) of the LCIA Rules 2020 ( LCIA Rules )).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content