This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
We generally negotiated those pricing and terms and conditions with our contracting officers. And so we relaxed that to one process. The cool thing too, is that we used to run separately a pricing compliance report and we’re actually running this report before the vendors even submit their modification.”
Two leading models are private and cooperative vendor networks. Aggregators Vendor networks come in several forms. Some giant procure-to-pay (P2P) solutions also have vendor networks financed by supplier fees. This type of network offers very little control to the individual procurement organization.
We want to ensure we’re always, always getting the best price for U.S. The post OMB gives agencies new considerations when buying AI first appeared on Federal News Network. taxpayers on the products and services that we are acquiring.”
GSA to Rightsize MAS Program Through Vendor and SIN Removals Federal News Network reports that as part of the General Services Administrations (GSA) efforts to right size the Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) Program , it is removing vendors that have not met their sales quota within the last year or had performance and compliance issues.
In all, Federal News Network has learned that GSA expects to save more than $15 million a year through these and other consolidation efforts, which are part of several ongoing initiatives GSA is pursuing to consolidate and make the schedules program more efficient. It moves the needle a little bit.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content