This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
By: Richard Arnholt On November 8, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) denied an unsuccessful bidder’s protest that asserted the Veteran Administration’s (VA) evaluation of Texas Waste Company’s past performance was unreasonable and reflected the Contracting Officer’s (CO) bias.
Curiously, as much as it is referenced in the FAR, there is no set definition for “request for equitable adjustment” in the FAR. Requests for equitable adjustment are considered negotiations rather than litigation, and under FAR 31.205-33 , contractadministration costs are allowable costs. This was the finding in Tip Top Const.,
While the PAP’s Background section cites this definition of what is “fair and reasonable,” the PAP’s “guidance” sets standards and directives that raises questions whether, when read as a whole, it provides guidance that will result in a price and terms that are fair to both parties in a transaction. Emphasis added.) See Section 2.
David Berteau One of the real problems that we have in in government contracting today, in fact, it’s problem across America, is something that we have more vacant jobs in this country than we have people looking for work. How do you manage that in contractadministration? So, but how do you verify that in a proposal?
While the PAP’s Background section cites this definition of what is “fair and reasonable,” the PAP’s “guidance” sets standards and directives that raises questions whether, when read as a whole, it provides guidance that will result in a price and terms that are fair to both parties in a transaction. Emphasis added.) See Section 2.
Additionally, generally, the reasonable costs of preparing, submitting, and negotiating an REA are contractadministration costs, and consequently are also recoverable. Inverted Yield Curve: Definition, What It Can Tell Investors, and Examples, Investopedia.com (updated Dec. a labor union), and to state and local government. [60]
Labor costs for which a definitive union agreement exists’);]” (9) “Allocate that part of the contract price subject to adjustment to specific periods of time (e.g., The goal is for the modification to be more of an issue of the parties responding to a performance dilemma, then it is altering the premise of the contract award.
Particularly, what does the contract say? If the contract follows the Uniform Contract Format , the first place to look is Section F (Deliveries or performance), Section G (Contractadministration data), or Section H (Special contract requirements). [13] 11] See 41 U.S.C. §§ 6501-11; see also 41 C.F.R. §
Updated definitions now align "significant deficiency" with "material weakness" based on the January 17th final rule. Contractors should anticipate new processes and points of contact for existing and future government-wide acquisition contracts (GWACs). USAID Compliance Alert: Stop Work Order Invoicing Whats happening?
Background, of PAP 2021-05. While the PAP’s Background section cites this definition of what is “fair and reasonable,” the PAP’s “guidance” sets standards and directives that raises questions whether, when read as a whole, it provides guidance that will result in a price and terms that are fair to both parties in a transaction.
A furlough is generally expected to be a temporary disruption, while a layoff is generally more definite. This is important for contractadministration and staffing concerns. In either case, an employee is likely eligible for unemployment benefits.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content