This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
These and other constraints under the model law are commendable anti-corruption measures, but may make it more difficult to accommodate emerging “green procurement” approaches. Article 8, for example, warns the procuring agency, “when first soliciting the participation of.
Anticipating additional caselaw on the definition of a “direct relationship” is both of interest and a potential necessity, as the amended provision introduces ambiguity surrounding this specific definition. What constitutes a “direct relationship” remains unclear, leaving room for various interpretations and potential disputes.
Dr Baltag first observed that one of the challenges arbitration practitioners are currently facing with regards to ethics and regulation of misbehaviour in international arbitration is the diversity of relevant and applicable standards.
This includes a fairly broad and future-oriented definition of AI, provisions on safeguarding confidentiality and furthermore, ensuring the integrity of the arbitral proceeding. laws, treaties, domestic statues, ethical rules, etc.) Where rules and regulations (e.g.
JAMS describes these new rules as “clear guidelines and procedures that address the unique challenges presented by AI, such as questions of liability, algorithmic transparency, and ethical considerations.” The breadth of this definition impacts parties that incorporate the JAMS AI Rules into their agreements.
Lastly, he underscored the necessity of upholding the values of the legal profession by promoting and enforcing a consistent understanding of ethical values and principles. He noted that this challenge might become even more serious in the future and may require a more definitive solution. in the draft 7th ed. SIAC Rules.
Delamuta then compared the concepts of fundamental breach and definitive default provided in the paragraph of article 395 of the Brazilian Civil Code. In business contracts, private autonomy and good faith are polarized by business dynamics, making the arbitrator’s activity even more complex.
The definition of “ investor ” requires legal persons to engage in “ substantive business operations ” in a host State. This is in line with the CJEU’s ruling in Achmea (C-284/16), deciding that investor-State arbitration under intra-EU BITs is incompatible with EU law. What Is Covered in Their Scope?
It requires that parties and their representatives ensure AI-generated submissions are accurate and meet ethical and professional standards. It emphasizes the arbitrator’s responsibility to critically assess AI outputs, ensuring they do not mistakenly take them as definitive sources without independent verification of their reliability.
Risk is inherent to all investments; in fact, the assumption of risk is often included in the definition of “investment” in investment treaties. Regardless of whether this is ethical, is it still solid advice? Not exactly a recipe for a stable investment climate.
With this objective in mind, the PAIC, lists a range of investor obligations related to corporate social responsibility, use of natural resources, corporate governance, business, ethics and human rights. The framing of this standard has evolved over time. The cited document is the January 2023 draft version of the Protocol.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content