This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Customs and Border Protection confirmed in a privacy review published earlier this month that it was no longer collecting telemetry data, or smartphone location data, provided by commercial firms. Employees using this system were required to review and sign rules of behavior, the impactassessment noted.
Back in January, Immigration and Customs Enforcement said it had stopped using commercial telemetry data that government agencies buy from private companies. The move comes as civil rights advocates have raised repeated concerns about the use of commercial telemetry data. Within DHS, the use of this data has raised alarm bells.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement has stopped using commercial telemetry data, which can include phone data that reveals a person’s location, an agency spokesperson confirmed to FedScoop. The move comes amid ongoing bipartisan concern about law enforcement agency purchases of peoples’ location data without obtaining a warrant.
The Department of Veterans Affairs has awarded Sierra7 a contract to help the Office of Information Technology Privacy Services conduct privacy impactassessments for data within the VA's electronic information systems.
When we launched the campaign in May 2024, we identified a lack of accessible, consolidated data on Olympic-related projects. Although there was an official delivery plan for the Games, as specified in a September 2023 governmental decree, we found data and documents on its delivery scattered across various public and private actors.
Disaster reduction efforts focus on prediction, monitoring, and impactassessment through a cycle of prevention, preparedness, emergency response, and recovery. Droughts are classified into four categories, from meteorological drought characterized by low precipitation to socioeconomic drought impacting human activities.
TIGTA also gave the IRS kudos for its transparency in how it uses the sign-on tool, posting a Privacy and Civil Liberties ImpactAssessment for the Secure Access Digital Identity system to its website.
But the agency’s provisional approval of a few generative AI products — which include ChatGPT, Bing Chat, Claude 2, DALL-E2, and Grammarly, per a privacy impactassessment — call for closer examination in regard to federal transparency. Zhou also pointed to record management and data storage as a potential issue.
Centering worker empowerment is considered by DOL to be the document’s “North Star.” That principle pushes employers and developers to integrate “early and regular input from workers into the adoption and use of AI.”
At the time of the publication of that disclosure, the AI tool, which describes its training data as “agency generated,” was in production for more than one year. While we continue to have a human assess every tip, AI can help our teams be better at their jobs and keep Americans safe by prioritizing our workload.”
is actively working to introduce a “light touch” artificial intelligence bill that would aim to protect consumers and entrepreneurs by requiring AI companies to conduct risk and impactassessments for critical-impact AI systems and then undergo certification of such systems, according to a draft of the legislation obtained by FedScoop.
This targeted approach offers clearer accountability, enhanced transparency, simplified risk assessment, and focused testing procedures. Cloud solutions can offer major environmental benefits with specialised data centres. Fairness Imbalances in training data may result in bias that impacts model decisions.
What is known is how no deal is expected to impact the UK economy, businesses and their supply chains. The government’s no deal Brexit impactassessment detailed everything that organisations have been warning about – new procedures, new regulations and long delays at UK/EU borders. What happens next is anyone’s guess.
Digitalisation could reduce the administrative burden through automation, generate data insights to inform policies and boost efficiency in public spending, and serve as a living lab for GovTech experimentation.
The government took three key steps: i) careful planning for the green transition; ii) implementing green public procurement (GPP) in practice with a focus on building the capacity of public buyers; and iii) learning powered by data-driven monitoring with a public dashboard. Can everything be green?
New legislation is required to impose specific minimum requirements of eg data governance and algorithmic impactassessment and related transparency across the public sector, to address the issue of lack of standards and metrics but without reliance on their development by and within the AI industry.
In certain situations, deployers have additional duties to carry out data protection impactassessments (Article 26(9)) and cooperate with national EU authorities (Article 26(12)).
To that effect, it is important to identify an area of public sector digitalisation which is primarily or solely left to ‘regulation by contract’ through procurement—to isolate it from the interaction with other tools of digital regulation (such as data protection, or sectoral regulation).
The expansion of biometrics — and in particular, personal data about peoples’ faces — comes amid ongoing issues with the app’s technical capabilities. The update is also intended to decrease travel document fraud and improve the agency’s “ability to identify criminals and known or suspected terrorists.”
This will include improving IT infrastructure to be able to handle AI training and inference; developing adequate infrastructure and capacity to share, curate, and govern agency data for use in AI modeling; updating cybersecurity; and integrating the “potential beneficial uses of generative AI in their missions.” race, age, sex, etc.);
Data quality and availability are key. Generate disaggregated data to enable racial equity assessments, conduct monitoring and evaluation, and generate evidence to strengthen decision-making. Racial equity budgeting tools allow governments to identify gaps and analyze the impact of spending on different racial groups.
Third, the alignment provides an opportunity to improve data management. FAS and the federal government as a whole are in the midst of a management transition towards data-driven decision making. Data context is critical to data driven decision making. How old is the data? Is the data accurate?
The document suggests that those looking to deploy generative artificial intelligence conduct a privacy impactassessment, as well as tailored generative AI-focused training for employees with access to protected data and the implementation of a full lifecycle stewardship of data.
There is a commonality of risks (eg discrimination, data governance risks) that would be better managed if there was a joined up approach. general minimum practices Both in relation to safety- and rights-impact AI uses, the Draft AI in Government Policy would require agencies to engage in risk management both before and while using AI.
“Iris scanners are just a part of our biometric collection, like the collection of fingerprints and photographs for facial comparison,” said the spokesperson, who also cited a 2017 privacy impactassessment. Iris recognition, originally, wasn’t done that way.
CBP has created a privacy threshold analysis an internal document used to analyze potential privacy risks associated with a new technology and whether a privacy impactassessment is necessary for Starlink internet, a step from agency officials that indicates that the SpaceX service is under serious consideration.
By creating friction, I mean the need for a structured decision-making process that allows for collective deliberation within and around the adopting institution, and which is supported by rigorous impactassessments that tease out second and third order implications from AI adoption, as well as thoroughly interrogating first order issues around data (..)
The memo strongly emphasizes AI innovation, instructing agencies to build IT infrastructure to support AI, collect data to train AI and evaluate potential applications of generative AI. The order also requires that agencies convene AI governance bodies and that they develop enterprise AI strategies.
In the past, the agency purchased licenses from the data mining services company Creative Radicals for social media threat monitoring. The Secret Service has also disclosed a social media screening contract through a privacy impactassessment. Many of the companies mentioned did not respond to requests for comment.
Some of those systems might end up on OpenNet , a global network State uses for data applications. A privacy impactassessment for the system explains that the platform is a data and file storage system for the agency. A platform called AIDNet may also be shut down, the source added.
OPMs Office of Inspector General said in a letter to Democrats on the House Oversight Committee that it would incorporate parts of the lawmakers February request to probe DOGEs unauthorized accessing of IT networks and Americans data into existing work.
The Office of Personnel Management last Friday quietly replaced the privacy impactassessment for the governmentwide email system it has been using to send mass email blasts to the entirety of the federal government. The original PIA reads: “The Employee Response Data is explicitly voluntary. Why’s that important?
As part of its motion for dismissal, OPM submitted to the court a privacy impactassessment, which details how the system it is using to send email blasts to all federal employees regarding the Trump administrations reduction in force efforts collects, hosts and disseminates information to federal employees.
The plaintiffs presume that if the server is left operational, it will continue to collect personally identifiable information on any federal workers who respond to the previous emails and put that data at risk of compromise. The lawsuit also cites reports that claim the server is retaining information about every employee of the U.S.
But according to the lawsuit, once Bessent was confirmed, he placed that employee on leave and provided the DOGE crew with full access to the Bureaus data and the computer systems that house them. A Treasury employee initially prevented DOGE workers from accessing those records, through the departments Bureau of the Fiscal Service.
One of Elon Musks DOGE surrogates has a pathway to accessing the sensitive data of millions of Americans housed in Treasury Department systems, a federal judge ruled late Friday. Judge Jeannette A.
While roll call votes on Cruz’s proposals to repeal the AI executive order in its entirety and prevent environmental impactassessments on AI systems failed at the markup Wednesday, another amendment that would dull the teeth of federal government actions to prevent bias and discrimination in AI systems advanced in a substitute via voice vote.
A lawsuit filed in federal court Monday alleges that the Office of Personnel Management set up an on-premise server to conduct last weeks mass email blast to federal employees and store information it received in response without doing a privacy impactassessment on the system as required by law.
And during the Biden administration, the departments of Energy and Transportation and the Social Security Administration all had non-career CIOs, according to data from the Plum Book , a dataset of government roles maintained by OPM. DHS, meanwhile, is presidentially appointed but not Senate-confirmed.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content