This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Harnessing AI is a useful way to advance modernization goals, but AI governance—including ethical considerations, data security, and compliance with federal regulations—must remain a top priority. And increased AI implementation demand that organizations rethink how they staff, develop, and run their day-to-day operations. .”
Perhaps surprisingly, the biggest developments do not concern the regulation of AI under the devolved model described in the ‘pro-innovation’ whitepaper, but its displacement outside existing regulatory regimes—both in terms of funding, and practical power. Twitter announcements vs whitepaper? Comments welcome!
And most importantly, how to accomplish all this securely, and ethically. For FedInsider, he has written many articles and whitepapers and acted as the moderator for over 20 interviews featuring federal, state and local officials discussing technology, policy and governmental issues.
The AI [whitepaper] indicates in Annex A that each regulator should consider issuing guidance on the interpretation of the principles within its regulatory remit, and suggests that in doing so they may want to rely on emerging technical standards (such as ISO or IEEE standards).
To do so successfully, leaders in critical sectors like healthcare, finance, and federal government must develop ethical policies for using data securely in AI. For instance, AI-powered tools can improve operations by streamlining processes, a tactical benefit.
To do so successfully, leaders in critical sectors like healthcare, finance, and federal government must develop ethical policies for using data securely in AI. For instance, AI-powered tools can improve operations by streamlining processes, a tactical benefit.
However, its findings are sufficiently worrying as to require a much more robust policy intervention that the proposals in the recently released WhitePaper ‘AI regulation: a pro-innovation approach’ ( for discussion, see here ). None of this features in the recently released WhitePaper ‘AI regulation: a pro-innovation approach’.
It will collaborate with existing organisations within government, academia, civil society, and the private sector to avoid duplication, ensuring that activity is both informing and complementing the UK’s regulatory approach to AI as set out in the AI Regulation whitepaper’.
Swimming against the tide, and seeking to diverge from the EU’s regulatory agenda and the EU AI Act , the UK announced a light-touch ‘pro-innovation approach’ in its July 2022 AI regulation policy paper. What is the place and role of the Office for AI and the Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation in all this?
This opportunity allows industry to submit whitepapers at any time that are aligned with one of the DPA’s areas of focus, including sustaining critical production, commercializing research and development investments, and scaling emerging technologies.
For FedInsider, he has written many articles and whitepapers and acted as the moderator for over 20 interviews featuring federal, state and local officials discussing technology, policy and governmental issues.
But when critical decisions hinge on AI, ethics, accountability, and trust become non-negotiable. For FedInsider, he has written many articles and whitepapers and acted as the moderator for over 20 interviews featuring federal, state and local officials discussing technology, policy and governmental issues.
They emphasized a strategic, ethical, and well-managed approach to AI deployment in federal agencies. For FedInsider, he has written many articles and whitepapers and acted as the moderator for over 20 interviews featuring federal, state and local officials discussing technology, policy and governmental issues.
Luke Keller, Chief Innovation Officer at US Census bureau, highlighted using NIST guidelines, including bias reduction frameworks, to ensure ethical and accurate AI deployment. Risk Mitigation: Risks vary by application. High-quality, diverse datasets are essential. Use Cases: Start small with proofs of concept to test limitations and risks.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content