This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Unpacking the Black Box of Price Analysis Over the last several years, GSA has been using a series of data management tools to support the priceevaluation of products under the Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) program. The next logical step is to provide industry partners with direct access to the algorithm and pricing database.
3] TINA defines cost or pricing data to mean all facts that, as of the relevant date, a prudent buyer or seller would reasonably expect to affect pricenegotiations significantly. [4] 4] TINA is intended to “level the playing field” by providing Government negotiators the same cost or pricing data available to contractors.
Unpacking the Black Box of Price Analysis Over the last several years, GSA has been using a series of data management tools to support the priceevaluation of products under the Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) program. The next logical step is to provide industry partners with direct access to the algorithm and pricing database.
This language would require suppliers to adhere to specified actions that are “consistent with the Framework” (although the bills do not specify what these actions will be) and provide “appropriate access to data, models, and parameters…to enable sufficient test and evaluation, verification, and validation.” Register now by clicking here.
The key features of the JPSR system are: Confidential, user-based access to protect data entry; Risk event evaluation, root cause analysis, and higher-level investigation; Customizable analytical tools and reports to develop and implement proper quality control measures; and Dashboards for monitoring, measuring, and analyzing key data.
Federal contractors must maintain written affirmative action plans, which are subject to evaluation by the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP). Certain modifications may necessitate preliminary pricenegotiations to protect the governments interests.
Healthcare Spotlight: HHS Announces Medicare Part D NegotiatedPrices This week, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released the final drug pricesnegotiated through its Medicare Drug PriceNegotiation Program established under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA).
Relatedly, the Department is authorized to evaluate risks associated with the likelihood that an IaaS product or provider may be used for malicious cyber-enabled activity, and recommend remediation measures to address such risks. Access the recording here. For any assistance, please contact Michael Hanafin at mhanafin@thecgp.org.
Additionally, depending on the level of uncertainty, the Government may (but is not required to) place a ceiling on the total contract price, and/or on each performance period. The subsequent pricenegotiations are a major administrative headache for the contracting office and the contractor. Now, the downside. 206, 209-10 (Jan.
The AISIC will develop guidelines for “red-teaming, capability evaluations, risk management, safety and security, and watermarking synthetic content,” and will be housed within the U.S. Similar to the recent OASIS+ procurement, Alliant 3 will utilize a self-scoring system to evaluate a contractor’s status as a BIC solution provider.
These include: (1) negotiations only with the best suited offeror (i.e., the apparent successful offeror); (2) use of the highest rated offeror best value methodology; and (3) the determination of a fair and reasonable price. In context, “considered” means that price may not be treated as a nominal factor. acquisitions.
GSAs Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) Policy and Procedure (PAP) 2021-05, Evaluation of FSS Program Pricing, is not a regulation and was not subject to public review and comment. Finally, there are thousands and thousands of pages of internal operating guidance that directly and significantly impact the public.
GSAs Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) Policy and Procedure (PAP) 2021-05, Evaluation of FSS Program Pricing, is not a regulation and was not subject to public review and comment. Finally, there are thousands and thousands of pages of internal operating guidance that directly and significantly impact the public.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content