This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Manufacturers of platforms and ammunition must deal with a list of regulatory and legal challenges. Interview Transcript: Tom Temin And we think of the defense industrial base has strained in terms of capacity to manufacture what’s needed around the world and, you know, missile systems and ammunition and so forth.
The EU has held political talks on a law that will ban the sale on the EU market of products made with forced labour, as well as the export of such products from the EU. The restrictions will cover all types of goods, whether manufactured in or imported into the EU, which are wholly or partially made using forced (including child) labour.
This follows negotiations between the EU Council and Parliament which took place on 22 January 2024 and the European Council and European Parliament reaching a provisional agreement on the Regulation on 5 March 2024.
On Tuesday 5 March 2024, the European Council and European Parliament reached a provisional agreement on the EU Forced Labour Regulation (“ Regulation “), which will prohibit the placing and making available on the EU market, or the export from the EU market, of products made, extracted or harvested using forced labour.
announced USD 280 billion in subsidies for its manufacturers, Japan and the EU announced subsidies for their own semiconductor industries. Other industries manufacturing products deemed critical to the energy transition and to national security have already followed – or will likely follow. to its hydrogen industry.
First, even though there are now hundreds of companies operating globally in the space industry, there remain, for example, no more than a handful of launch providers and satellite manufacturers (if that) in each jurisdiction. As a result, disputes concerning such apparatus tend to be heavily influenced by domestic politics and geopolitics.
For example, an aircraft manufacturer hires workers to produce a standard airplane for the U.S. The employees of this manufacturer would not be considered temporary.” Alternatively, it can give the contractor an opportunity to negotiate a termination-for-convenience or no-cost termination. 75] In re APA Transp. GDP at $27.9
Additionally, USTR invoked its authority to investigate restrictions to US commerce that include the provision of subsidies for the construction of vessels used in the commercial transportation by water of goods between foreign countries and the United States.
This is an opportunity for Canadian businesses to express pain points under the existing agreement, which Canada could present during the 2026 review and possibly negotiate appropriate action. The import prohibition was expanded to apply to goods mined or manufactured by child labour with the coming into force of the SCA on January 1, 2024.
opposition to granting China “developing nation” status in treaties under negotiation and by international organizations of which the U.S. ports by cranes manufactured by or in countries of concern, including Chinese commercial entities such as Shanghai Zhenhua Heavy Industries Co.
Canada retaliated swiftly by implementing retaliatory tariffs; however, both sets of tariffs were paused for 30-days while the US and Canada negotiated whether the tariffs would come into force. Despite Canada undertaking extensive measures to secure its border, the US implemented the US Tariffs at 12:01 AM EST on March 4, 2025.
announces tariffs on certain steel & aluminum products exported from Canada at rates of 25% and 10% under the authority of section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act. billion in imports, which represented the value of 2017 Canadian steel and aluminum exports affected by the U.S. March 8, 2018: U.S. May 31, 2018 : U.S.
Canada’s countermeasures The Canada Tariffs were implemented, despite a months-long effort by the Government of Canada negotiating with the U.S. and committing to crackdown on Canadian domestic drug manufacturing and announcing a CAD 1.3 exports in response to U.S. billion package to increase border security.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content