This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Department of Health and Human Services in Boehringer Ingelheim's challenge to a new Medicare drug pricenegotiation program, rejecting the pharmaceutical company's claim that the program is unconstitutional. A Connecticut federal judge on Wednesday sided with the U.S.
notified a Connecticut federal court Friday that it will appeal its loss in a lawsuit challenging a new Medicare drug pricenegotiation program on the grounds that it unlawfully compels the pharmaceutical giant to declare prices "fair," takes its property and imposes an excessive fine. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc.
An "unprecedented" new Medicare pricenegotiation program deprives drugmakers of their constitutional rights and forces them to make declarations on issues of public concern that reflect poorly on them, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Special focus on contract pricing). pricenegotiations and procedures should be used by contracting officers to determine the price reasonableness of modifications offered under a sealed bid contract. Contracting officers are required to document in the contract file the principal elements of the negotiated agreement.
Boehringer Ingelheim and other drugmakers are free to take their business elsewhere if they object to the new Medicare pricenegotiation program, the federal government has said, urging a judge to reject the company's claims of constitutional violations.
AstraZeneca has chided the federal government for seeking a quick win against the drugmaker's challenge to the Medicare drug pricenegotiation program in a recent brief, arguing that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services mistakenly believes it has "absolute authority to unilaterally dictate prices."
Transparent access for industry to FAS’s pricing database would streamline the evaluation price, providing both parties to the negotiation a common, understood framework for pricenegotiations. Such access is in the public interest because it promotes efficiency and realism. Moreover, there is precedent for it.
3] TINA defines cost or pricing data to mean all facts that, as of the relevant date, a prudent buyer or seller would reasonably expect to affect pricenegotiations significantly. [4] 4] TINA is intended to “level the playing field” by providing Government negotiators the same cost or pricing data available to contractors.
This training will also take place at Miller & Chevalier Chartered (900 16th St. NW, Washington, D.C. 20006), with virtual attendance available as well.
Transparent access for industry to FAS’s pricing database would streamline the evaluation price, providing both parties to the negotiation a common, understood framework for pricenegotiations. Such access is in the public interest because it promotes efficiency and realism. Moreover, there is precedent for it.
Topics covered during the training will include: The GSA Schedules Program: An Entry Point to Government Contracting Obtaining Your GSA Schedule or Schedule Modification, along with Option Extensions Navigating the PriceNegotiation Process Better Understanding of Management and Compliance of the Price Reduction Clause Schedule e-Tools: Tips on Competing (..)
This training will also take place at Miller & Chevalier Chartered (900 16th St. NW, Washington, D.C. 20006), with virtual attendance available as well.
Johnston best of luck in her next pricenegotiation with a “proven enterprise technology company.” The lead story in this Wall Street Journal article makes me sick. I sincerely wish Ms. And I sure as hell hope they call her bluff.
Now there is a time and a place for pricenegotiation of course, but if you are an organisation where speed, innovation and agility is really important, key suppliers who play essential roles need to be handled differently. .
The training provides the perfect opportunity to learn about navigating the pricenegotiation process, leveraging GSA’s tools, understanding the management and compliance of the Price Reduction Clause, the relative merits of the Commercial Sales Practices format versus Transactional Data Reporting, and more.
Plus, you will be able to advise your in-house clients regarding topics such as: Disclosure of company records; Establishing management and compliance processes; Establishing ethics programs and mandatory disclosure; Avoiding penalties; and Identifying resources to assist with continuing legal support of your internal GSA/VA Schedule programs.
Plus, you will be able to advise your in-house clients regarding topics such as: Disclosure of company records; Establishing management and compliance processes; Establishing ethics programs and mandatory disclosure; Avoiding penalties; and Identifying resources to assist with continuing legal support of your internal GSA/VA Schedule programs.
Sonia Pesantes, Managing Principal Consultant, and Sean Nulty, Principal Consultant, will present insights from their experiences with the Information Technology (IT) center at GSA with a focus on fair and reasonable pricingnegotiations. To register for this members-only meeting, click here.
The shutdown could slow the implementation of the administration’s Medicare drug pricenegotiations (set to begin October 1, 2023), and could threaten HHS oversight of the Medicaid “unwinding” process, as states reevaluate the eligibility of enrollees.
Healthcare Spotlight: HHS Announces Medicare Part D NegotiatedPrices This week, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released the final drug pricesnegotiated through its Medicare Drug PriceNegotiation Program established under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA).
Certain modifications may necessitate preliminary pricenegotiations to protect the governments interests. Modifications can be either bilateral, requiring both parties to sign, or unilateral, signed only by the contracting officer.
Topics covered during the training will include: The GSA Schedules Program: An Entry Point to Government Contracting Obtaining Your GSA Schedule or Schedule Modification, along with Option Extensions Navigating the PriceNegotiation Process Better Understanding of Management and Compliance of the Price Reduction Clause Schedule e-Tools: Tips on Competing (..)
Additionally, depending on the level of uncertainty, the Government may (but is not required to) place a ceiling on the total contract price, and/or on each performance period. The subsequent pricenegotiations are a major administrative headache for the contracting office and the contractor. Now, the downside.
These include: (1) negotiations only with the best suited offeror (i.e., the apparent successful offeror); (2) use of the highest rated offeror best value methodology; and (3) the determination of a fair and reasonable price.
It also defies common sense, directing contracting officers to leverage the collective buying power of the federal government through pricenegotiations when the contract only provides a $2500 guaranteed minimum and the opportunity to compete for customer requirements at the order level.
It also defies common sense, directing contracting officers to leverage the collective buying power of the federal government through pricenegotiations when the contract only provides a $2500 guaranteed minimum and the opportunity to compete for customer requirements at the order level.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content